How to Develop that Law Side Manner or the Tale of the Crumbum

By the time Mr/Mrs. XX gets into my office s/he is angry, frazzled and scared. S/he is also worried about what the whole thing will cost, how much trouble the lawyer is going to create and will probably have talked with his or her friends, neighbors, and others about whether she should take the crumbum who is making her life difficult to court. S/he will also have been warned by many of these self-same people about the lawyer, and given a great deal of (free) legal advice, only some of which is worth what she paid for it. So by the time Mr/Mrs. XX walks into your office, her story of he done me wrong can be so short or long or convoluted or laden with side notes and comments, that I need to dig for more information just to find out the basics. How to do this? Well, I try to be kind in asking questions. (Those of you who know me are surprised by this statement I know. But it’s true. I try to be kind. I try to be the law confessor of wrongs. I try to be the one Mr/Mrs can come to for action. Getting a clear, accurate, factual, complete tale is often the making or breaking of a case.

So let me help you unpack your case of woes against the crumbum. Take all the time you need to do this. It will be cheaper in the long run. And believe me, it will take time. So I try to listen with the right side of my brain and not go all analytical on her while she is talking. I try to sit tight. There’s plenty of time to do that after she gets the full story out of all the things the crumbum has done.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on How to Develop that Law Side Manner or the Tale of the Crumbum

Law Side Manner

I was recently listening to Louis Black rant about mortgages being tough to read. He is right. When I refinanced my house I had to use a ruler to follow the fine print. Then I had to constantly refer back to figure out who they were talking about. It was infuriating. So Listening to Louis Black rant made me think.

Good lawyers win in court when they tell a compelling story to the jury and judge. Likewise, good lawyers win clients when they can listen to the client’s complaints and say it back to them in understandable legal language so the client knows a) that the lawyer understands; b) that the lawyer can explain in clear, understandable English, what the legal issues are, and c) what the lawyer is planning to do to help them win their case. For lack of a better name, I call this ability a Law Side Manner or LSM.

Some lawyers, the lucky ones, have a naturally high-level LSM. Most do not. The rest of us have to work at it. But developing LSM is a learning curve. Don’t expect to know it all at once. I will be posting more on what this manner looks like and how to use it to win more clients and stay on top of client relations.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Law Side Manner

Can I send another lawyer legal papers by email and/or fax?

That depends. As long as there is agreement among the lawyers, it should be no problem. But in litigation, games arrive immediately.  In some courts, Maryland for example, you can fax documents to the other side, but you must also mail them, or it is invalid.  In D.C. faxing documents is not a problem and you don’t have to mail them.  In Virginia, if the lawyer puts his fax number on the pleadings he is consenting to service by fax and you don’t have to mail them.  That’s why many Virginia lawyers do not put their fax number on their pleadings.  I do, but I’ve been getting so many junk faxes that I make people call me first so I can turn on the fax machine for them.  (But I successfully objected last year when some smart guy tried to fax me 2 70 PAGE documents.  On a Friday evening to boot.)  In Federal court, documents are sent by email routinely and if you do not accept emailed documents the judges will be upset.

Me?  I prefer email but will cooperate as much as I can.  But I do email and fax and mail the same documents on a regular basis.  Frankly, I prefer to email and mail only but ….

So why do lawyers fight about it?  Sometimes it’s because they are trying to get a strategic advantage.  For example, under the Rules, you get (usually 3-5 days) extra time if the papers are mailed as opposed to being hand-delivered, emailed or faxed.  So they want the extra time.  Other times, they want to set the table to argue that your Motion is late and therefore they don’t have to respond and the Court should ignore it.

One not-so-amusing anecdote illustrating the problem:  In Fairfax, Virginia, we needed a local rule that all Motions and Oppositions etc. that were faxed out had to be delivered before 4:00 p.m. on Friday.  We did that because papers that were due on Friday were being faxed out at 11:00 p.m. Friday night in an attempt to shorten the notice for opposing lawyers who wouldn’t see the papers until Monday a.m. and the hearing was for the next Friday.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Can I send another lawyer legal papers by email and/or fax?

Copying, Scanning and Faxing Costs

Amazing, truly amazing.  Many firms charge for in house copying and scanning.  I don’t.  Why not?  Because it’s part of my cost of doing business.  I don’t charge for electricity so I don’t charge for copying costs.  But I’m seeing many firms charging up to $0.50/page for copying and scanning in house.  I’ve even seen fax charges of over $1.00/page.  Frankly, I don’t understand why they do it except that their clients let them get away with it.  It just seems to me that firms that do this are nickel-and-diming their clients.  I won’t do that.

I do charge for big jobs that I have to take to Kinko’s. Why?  Because if the job is that big and it’s out-of-pocket charges, then the client should pay.  But I don’t add on a mark-up to the charge.  It’s just the charge itself.

For me, it’s all part of the service and making my clients happy.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Copying, Scanning and Faxing Costs

Here’s my idea for how to go after someone who sues a client (usually for breaching an alleged contract) for no good reason

I.  Send a letter to the opposing counsel demanding that the case be withdrawn and explaining why there is no contract or there is no breach of contract.

II.  Research to figure out whether or not there are counterclaims available to my client.  Many possibilities come to mind depending on the facts.  Some possibilities to consider including are fraud, unjust enrichment, interference with business, unfair trade, and defamation.

III.  File any answer and counterclaim and accompany them with detailed discovery demanding all the papers and list all the witnesses involved in the case.  Don’t forget to include demands that they admit or deny key facts.

IV.  Notice a deposition of the other side’s key witness as soon as possible.

V.    Prepare for summary judgment (where possible, no SJ in Virginia)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Here’s my idea for how to go after someone who sues a client (usually for breaching an alleged contract) for no good reason

YouTube is a great teacher

Recently I’ve been telling clients to visit YouTube.com to study up on depositions.  I do this as part of working with them to prepare for their deposition.  It’s amazing how seeing what they should do (and watching some of the funny depositions others post) help them to learn what to do and what not to do.

Here are some wonderful, useful videos.  But don’t stop with these. If you look at these you can see a whole bunch of funny ones where people make every mistake in the book.  Learn from all of them.

Texas Style deposition.

Depositions: Four Rules of Answers Questions

Depositions: What to wear and how to prepare

What not to do during a deposition.

Preparing for your depostion (2 parts)

What types of questions are asked at a deposition?

Posted in Litigation | Comments Off on YouTube is a great teacher

Can business people learn from watching credit card collection brawls?

You bet you can.  Just watch.  These brawls are just like my business brawls writ small.  So, after watching some of the small claims court (General District Court in Virginia) cases involving credit cards, this is what I’ve learned.

First, is there a contract?  Well, the easy way is to keep a copy of the signed contract.  If you are not keeping copies of your contracts (signed by the other side of course) you have a problem.  And an “example” contract is not adequate.  You need the actual contract.  (I’ve run into this with disputes over internet domains among other things.)

Note:  Credit cards seem to have a provision in their contract that “use of the card constitutes acceptance.”  But then they have the problem of proving that the debtor actually “used” the card because they do not have a signed credit card slip or something to show that the debtor actually used the card.  They do show an amount owed, but that doesn’t prove that the debtor used the card. It just proves that someone is charging the debtor a fee.

If you don’t have the actual contract, you have several problems:

Problem number 1 is “how to show that there is a contract?”  Is there a written contract?  If not, can you show that you made an offer, that the other side accepted the offer, and that you did something you would not otherwise have done (what lawyers call “consideration.”) If you can show all 3 of these things, you can show that there was an oral contract.

Problem number 2 is “what are the terms of the contract?”  A written contract will have terms and conditions.  If there is no written contract, what do you do about late payments, interest fees, etc. etc.?  The answer is that you cannot.  If there are no terms, you are stuck.  The same is true about delivery dates.  When is the other side supposed to perform their obligations?  Without a written contract, it’s hard to know.  Soon, yes, but how soon?  Who pays first?  How much up front?

Problem number 3 is “If you cannot show that there is a contract, do you have to give up?”  No, you do not.  If you have paid the other side money and they didn’t live up to their obligation, you can sue for what lawyers call “unjust enrichment,” which is just what it sounds like.

Problem number 4 is “Do you have standing to sue?”  More to the point, do they have standing to sue you?  “What’s this mean?” you say.  Well, if the contract has been sold or taken over by another company (or debt collector) how can they show that they now own the contract?  This is not always easy unless there are detailed written records. Lots of times there are none.  Without records, a 3rd party cannot collect.

Problem number 5 is “How much is owed?”  This has a bunch of subsidiary questions: What is the base amount?  What is the rate of interest charged?  Are there penalties?  What about collection fees and costs?  If you don’t know, you don’t get any.

Problem number 6 is “Has your right to sue expired?”  In VA, MD and D.C., the statute of limitations on a written contract is 5 years.  But the statute of limitations on an oral contract is only 3 years.  So, how long ago did all this happen?  If you don’t know, you have a big problem.

Posted in Litigation | Comments Off on Can business people learn from watching credit card collection brawls?

In Reaction to the Earthquake

We all got a big reminder yesterday about cell phones and disasters.  Cell phones and text messages do not work right after an event like an earthquake hits.  The cell phone lines get overloaded and in some cases, text messages and voicemail does not get delivered until hours after the event.

But those of us who were old fashioned enough to keep our landlines, were ok.  That technology was not knocked out, happily because the earthquake was not as bad as it could have been.

The short story is have backup to your cell phone technology.  Always wear suspenders and a belt.  Or, as my mother used to put it, always wear clean underwear because you never know…..

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on In Reaction to the Earthquake

A little light reading for Beach Week

Did you forget to pack that legal forensic thriller and now have 5 hours at the beach to endure without anything to read or do?

Never fear.

If you are like me, you have electronic gizmos scattered throughout your travel bags.  If so, you can log onto legal reading sites like Google Scholar.  There is just something so comforting about reading through the troubles of others while tanning at the beach.  Here are two more websites that have fun to read.

http://lawcrawler.findlaw.com/
http://vlib.org/Law

In addition to these legal sites, the New York Times has articles on surviving travel.  Here is a link to one that was posted just this week.

http://frugaltraveler.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/08/09/home-again-home-again/?hpw.

Have a great time but don’t feed the wildlife

Posted in Litigation | Comments Off on A little light reading for Beach Week

Rules of the Road or When to Call Your Attorney for his Opinion

You know how it is. You want to get away on your vacation. You assume the car will do just fine on the drive to the beach. So there you are v’rooming along down the highway when clunk! Clank! Surprise! Your car makes a weird noise and dies. Right in the middle of the Interstate highway.  Now, smile sweetly because you are the lead story on the national news as the car driver who shut down traffic on the interstate connecting Maine to Florida and created an 18 hour backup.. Such a joy. This is not something you will live down soon. Or ever.  Expect Jay Leno or John Stewart to poke fun at you and others to blame the government for not rescuing you (and them) fast enough.

But just because you let haste and assumptions get you into the evening news, don’t let haste and assumptions get you into a similar situation with the law.  Whether you are reviewing a million dollar contract, starting a business, buying a house, or purchasing a puppy, make sure you think before you sign.

To help you in that process, here are a few rules of the road avoid going to court over a deal gone wrong. .

First rule … Don’t ever assume that everything is ok when you are dealing with legal issues.

Second rule…Think about what it is you want to do and make a check list of how you want to achieve your goal.

Third rule…in case of doubt, remember “TANSTAAFL”  (“There Ain’t No Such Thing As a Free Lunch”).  Believe me, it controls all legal situations.

Fourth rule…Be sure to remember President Reagan’s motto”Trust but Verify.”  Be sure to include on your checklist all the things that have to be done to verify your trust. Where should you check?  Try Google,  Look up the person making you the offer on the internet and verify that he/she is offering a legitimate deal.  Keep in mind that if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.  Too good to be true.  This falls under the ‘no free lunch’ rule of thumb.

Fifth rule …  Get a professional to assist you in reviewing your legal papers.

Sixth rule … have your attorney’s number on your cellphone so you can reach him/her easily whenever these bumps in the road happen.

Seventh rule … ask your attorney for his opinion before you sign.  Signing is easy.  Getting out of a bad deal is hard.

Eight rule and most important … Listen to your attorney’s advice. You don’t have to take it, but listen and take it into account. Maybe you need to take extra precautions?

In other words, have fun out there but beware and have a great attorney available to help with the heavy lifting.

Posted in Litigation | Comments Off on Rules of the Road or When to Call Your Attorney for his Opinion